Background and Objectives
Person-centered planning (PCP) allows recipients of home and community-based service (HCBS) to plan services and supports according to their preferences and needs. The extent to which HCBS systems engage in PCP and evidence for the relationship between PCP and beneficiary outcomes is limited. We examine the prevalence of PCP among HCBS recipients and the relationship between PCP and person-reported outcomes.
Research Design and Methods
We used the 2018-2019 National Core Indicators-Aging and Disability survey, collected among adult Medicaid HCBS recipients in 12 states (n = 5,849). We examined two general PCP measures (one on decision-making and another on whether service plans reflected preferences/choices). We also constructed a scale to assess the fidelity of recipients’ service planning meeting to the person-centered planning process. Outcomes included unmet service needs and community living (i.e., participation, control, and satisfaction). We examined recipient characteristics associated with PCP and used adjusted logistic regression models to assess the relationship between PCP and outcomes.
Results
About 72% of HCBS recipients were involved in decision-making, 72% reported their service plan reflected their preferences/choices, and 47% had meetings that scored “high fidelity” on the PCP fidelity scale. PCP measures were consistently related to lower likelihood of unmet service needs and greater likelihood of experiencing community living outcomes.
Discussion and Implications
Findings suggest PCP is important for adequately meeting service needs and ensuring community living among HCBS beneficiaries. Additional standardized measures should be developed to facilitate quality improvement and accountability for delivering person-centered HCBS.